Posted on March 10th, 2017 by Rachel
Performance Counts: March 2017
This past Sunday, we opened Remembering Auschwitz: History, Holocaust, Humanity, a unique and important exhibit that encourages visitors to explore Holocaust history and commemoration through the lens of Auschwitz. The following are some interesting facts and figures about the exhibit.
Photo by Will Kirk
>Number of Exhibits on Display: 4 (A Town Know As Auschwitz: The Life and Death of a Community, Architecture of Murder, Loss And Beauty: Photographs by Keron Psillas and The Holocaust Memory Reconstruction Project)
>Number of Years Exhibit Has Been in the Works: 2 ½ years
Deborah leads a docent tour through “Remembering Auschwitz”
>Percentage of Jewish Population in Oswiecim (the name of the town prior to Nazi occupation in 1939) in the Years Prior to the Holocaust: As high as 50%
>Number of Synagogues in Oswiecim prior to 1939: 30
>Percentage of Jewish population of Oswiecim Murdered at Auschwitz: 90%
Detail of “Architecture of Death” panel
>Year in Which Construction of Auschwitz Commenced: 1940
>Number of Camps Constructed at Auschwitz: 3 main camps (Auschwitz I, Auschwitz II – also known as Birkenau and Auschwitz III – also known as Buna and Monowitz
> Estimated Number of Inmates Murdered at Auschwitz: 1.1 million including 1 million Jews
Photo by Will Kirk.
>Number of Photos on Display By Keron Psillas: 25
>Number of Miles Photos Traveled from their Last Installation in Hollywood, Florida: 1080 miles
Photo by Will Kirk.
>Number of Collages Created as Part of the Holocaust Memory Reconstruction Project: 91
>Number of Countries of Origin of Individuals Honored Through Collages: 12
Photo by Will Kirk.
>Total attendance at Sunday’s opening: 242 people
>Number of Related Programs Planned Over the Next Three Months: 16
>Date Exhibit Ends: May 29, 2017
Of course, numbers alone do not tell the whole story, certainly not of the devastation of the Holocaust, nor the impact that we hope this exhibit will have on our visitors. It was an extraordinary experience watching families who participated in the collage making workshops gather around their plaques on display with tears in their eyes and pride in the knowledge that their family members’ stories now have permanent homes at the JMM. While it is too soon to report on the total number of visitors which will include many school group visitors, we look forward to keeping you posted.
~Deborah Cardin, Deputy Director
Posted on March 9th, 2017 by Rachel
Last Sunday, over 200 people attended the JMM’s latest exhibition opening for Remembering Auschwitz: History, Holocaust and Humanity. We are so grateful to the Holocaust survivors and their families that joined us that morning and took part in the art installation, Holocaust Memory Reconstruction: A Sacred Culture Rebuilt. This installation commissioned by Lori Shocket and the Human Element Project, featured collages that were created by the survivors and their families documenting their lives from the past to the present. What touched me most about the morning was watching these families (many inter-generational) looking at the collages and watching having younger family members call out, “Wow, I did not know that,” or “You never told me that before.” These younger family members were learning about their family narratives and creating a “strong inter-generational self”, as described by psychologist, Marshall Duke from Emory University.
Photo by Will Kirk.
Watching this interaction between family members got me thinking about next week’s My Family Story Exhibition in partnership with Beit Hatfutsot, The Museum of the Jewish People in Israel. Area students from Beth Tfiloh Dahan Community School, Baltimore Hebrew Congregation and Bolton Street Synagogue have been on a journey, interviewing family members and researching their own family stories and learning about their family narratives. These students have created art installations to reflect the research, interviews and stories that they have learned from their own families. The journey connects students to their personal stories, to their family stories, and to the greater story of the Jewish People joining many from Israel and around the Jewish world who are also participating in Beit Hatfutsot’s My Family Story program
The student’s projects will be judged at the exhibition based on a rubric that includes four points, Jewish peoplehood, depth of research, aesthetics and creativity. The projects will be scored and two winners from each school will be chosen and those projects will be sent on to Beit Hatfutsot and their museum staff has the responsibility of picking 40 international winners who will win a free trip to Israel. The projects will be displayed at the My Family Story exhibition later in June. Over the past two years, area students and their projects have been selected to participate in the international exhibition. Our staff at the JMM is hopeful to make it three in a row!
The My Family Story Exhibition will be on display at the Jewish Museum of Maryland from Tuesday, March 14th – Sunday, March 19th. Here is a sneak peak of some of the works in progress from the students at Bolton Street Synagogue…..
Can’t wait to see the context for this figure!
Love this use of the stove for a thematic background!
Looking forward to the story that goes with this.
Intriguing use of colors and photos!
Posted on March 8th, 2017 by Rachel
Article by Avi Y. Decter. Originally published in Generations 2011 – 2012: Jewish Foodways
The boycott of 1910 was one dramatic episode in a twenty-year struggle over kosher meat that engaged meat wholesalers, retail butchers, shochets (ritual slaughterers), the Orthodox rabbinate, and thousands of ordinary Jews, especially in East Baltimore. In the first decades of the twentieth century, conflict over kosher meat was a familiar topic. Today, that contestation is little remembered and poorly documented. However, sufficient evidence survives to give us access to the trajectory and meaning of the protracted struggle over kosher meat. Here is that story.
Part II: The Issue of Rabbinic Authority
Missed part 1? Start here.
In 1896, one Herman Schwartzberg drew up a contract between a kosher butcher in Baltimore, Levy Edlavitch, and a shochet, Isaac Salowitschick, for the latter to slaughter cattle for the former at a fixed price per animal. Edlavitch ended his agreement with Salowitschick after two local Orthodox rabbis claimed that the shochet was not competent to carry out his duties. Only if the shochet brought a certificate from the objecting rabbis would the butcher retain the shochet.
The dismissed shochet promptly sued the butcher in local court for breach of contract, asserting that he was both competent and certified by a recognized rabbinic authority. The plaintiff claimed certification from a Russian rabbi and also from “Rabbi” Schwartzberg, who was himself a practicing ritual slaughterer – but only of chickens. Three expert shochets testified in court on the rules of schechita (ritual slaughter) and on the matter of rabbinic authority. In rebuttal, Salowitschick argued that “as there was no chief rabbi in Baltimore, any one of the rabbis was competent to pass upon the qualifications of the ‘schochet.’”
Rabbi Dr. Schepsel Schaffer, from “The Jews of Baltimore.” JMM 1999.121.1
The next day, however, Rabbi Schepsel Shaffer of the Greene Street Congregation expounded in court on the rules of shechita, declaring that a rabbi had the authority to forbid a shochet from practicing “for no other reason than his not having asked permission of a rabbi to practice his calling.” Moreover, Schaffer testified, written agreements between a shochet and a butcher were impermissible – the shochet must be “amenable only to the rabbi, who is his superior.”
Rabbi Abraham Levinson, one of the two complaining rabbis, then testified. Rabbi Levinson stated that two written notices had been sent to the shochet demanding that he stop work. The rabbi also stated that two months before those notices sent a list of “recognized” shochets had been published in order to restrict entry into shechita, “as there was not enough work to support all who might wish to engage in it.” The plaintiff’s attorney countered that a “combine” of shochets controlled all the work of slaughtering for Orthodox congregations in East Baltimore and that the rabbis were paid to prohibit other shochets from practicing their trade. However, in his instructions to the jury, the judge indicated that the shochet must be subject to “the authority and official sanction” of the local rabbis and that any rabbi might prohibit a shochet from exercising his office.
Testimony in the case – which received extensive, detailed coverage in the Baltimore Sun – revealed real gaps in the certification process and divergent interests among rabbis, shochets, butchers, and consumers of kosher meats. To remedy the situation, two years later in 1899 an association of Orthodox rabbis was formed to assume supervision over all kosher slaughter in Baltimore. Where previously shochets were retained by the wholesale butchers, the employment of all ritual slaughterers would now be supervised by the newly incorporated association, to which all the local Orthodox congregations were parties.
Continue to Part III: The Butchers Go on Strike
 “Scientific Slaughter,” Baltimore Sun, 3 April 1897, p. 10. “Mosaic Butchering,” Baltimore Sun, 6 April 1897, p. 10.
 “Mosaic Butchering”
 “Shulcan Orech Read,” Baltimore Sun, 7 April 1897, p. 10.
 “Shulcan Orech Read.”
 “To Supervise Slaughtering,” Baltimore Sun, 10 June 1899, p.12.